Lesson Plans

Introduction: Building Claims from Evidence

Fisherwoman Credit COSEE NOW

Purpose

Students will practice constructing claims using evidence and reasoning.

Learning Objectives

Students will practice the process of making claims, collecting evidence to support claims, and applying scientific reasoning to connect evidence to claims.

NASA Phenomenon Connection

This lesson does not directly align with phenomena-based learning by addressing disciplinary core ideas but rather the scientific practice of engaging in argument from evidence which NASA scientists must perform daily.  Essential to the nature of science, scientific knowledge is reliant upon a process of reasoning from evidence. This requires scientists to justify their scientific claim about the natural world, which in turn, other scientists attempt to refute by identifying weaknesses and limitations within the research.  NASA is no stranger to having to justify claims associated with contentious topics like global climate, severe weather, or sea level rise. NASA scientists must argue or defend their claims through data interpretation, experimental designs, and data analysis. This is commonly found in the form of defending claims using evidence and reasoning, defending climate models using evidence, or reviewing and critiquing the claims of other scientists by looking for sufficient and appropriate evidence of claims.

Essential Questions

  1. Why do scientists gather, classify, sequence, and interpret information?

  2. Why are making inferences/generalizations and justifying claims important in understanding our world?

  3. How can you use evidence to justify claims?

Cross-Curricular Connections

Common Core State Standards ELA Standards:

  • CCSS.ELA-LITERACY.RI.6.7: Integrate information presented in different media or formats (e.g., visually, quantitatively) as well as in words to develop a coherent understanding of a topic or issue.

  • CCSS.ELA-LITERACY.RI.6.8: Trace and evaluate the argument and specific claims in a text, distinguishing claims that are supported by reasons and evidence from claims that are not.

  • CCSS.ELA-LITERACY.RI.7.8: Trace and evaluate the argument and specific claims in a text, assessing whether the reasoning is sound and the evidence is relevant and sufficient to support the claims.

  • CCSS.ELA-LITERACY.RI.8.8 : Delineate and evaluate the argument and specific claims in a text, assessing whether the reasoning is sound and the evidence is relevant and sufficient; recognize when irrelevant evidence is introduced.

STEM Career Connections

  • General Scientist - A scientist is a person that works in a specific field to acquire or uncover knowledge related to the natural world.

  • Engineer - An engineer is a person that applies scientific knowledge, mathematics, and imagination to develop real-life solutions to technical problems.

  • Forensic Science Technicians - Assist in investigating crimes by collecting and analyzing evidence.

  • Reporters and Correspondents  - Report and write stories for news outlets.

Materials Required

Per Student:

  • Post-it Notes

  • Marker

  • Fisherman Observation Sheet

  • Student Data Sheet 1

  • C-E-R Rubric

Prerequisites Student Knowledge

Grades K-2:  Engaging in argument from evidence in K–2 builds on prior experiences and progresses to comparing ideas and representations about the natural and designed world(s).  

  • Identify arguments that are supported by evidence.  

  • Distinguish between explanations that account for all gathered evidence and those that do not.  

  • Analyze why some evidence is relevant to a scientific question and some is not.  

  • Distinguish between opinions and evidence in one’s own explanations.  

  • Listen actively to arguments to indicate agreement or disagreement based on evidence, and/or to retell the main points of the argument.  

  • Construct an argument with evidence to support a claim.  

  • Make a claim about the effectiveness of an object, tool, or solution that is supported by relevant evidence.

 

Grades 3-5:  Engaging in argument from evidence in 3–5 builds on K–2 experiences and progresses to critiquing the scientific explanations or solutions proposed by peers by citing relevant evidence about the natural and designed world(s).  

  • Compare and refine arguments based on an evaluation of the evidence presented.  

  • Distinguish among facts, reasoned judgment based on research findings, and speculation in an explanation.  

  • Respectfully provide and receive criticism from peers about a proposed procedure, explanation, or model by citing relevant evidence and posing specific questions.  

  • Construct and/or support an argument with evidence, data, and/or a model.  

  • Use data to evaluate claims about cause and effect.  Make a claim about the merit of a solution to a problem by citing relevant evidence about how it meets the criteria and constraints of the problem.

Procedure

Before Class: Draw the table below on the board.

Table
  1. Set the stage for learning by telling students that they will model the scientific practices of “Constructing explanations and engaging in argument from evidence.”  
  2. Distribute the Fisherman Observation Sheet to the class. Students may work in groups of two or individually.
  3. Students should scan over the four photos and make an inference about the event. Students identify key actions in the pictures, likely the cause and effect, etc..  Students should develop a story about what has happened to the woman in the photos linking the variables.
  4. Distribute Post-It notes and markers.  Fisherman Observation Sheet
  5. Students will identify possible independent and dependent variables in the scenario by inferring that they are related.  Each variable should go onto a separate Post-It Note.
    1. Possible variables could include:

      • independent variable (manipulated) - bucket falling, rainy weather, fisherperson trips over a rusty nail on deck
      • dependent variable (responding) - fisherperson falling, fisherperson taking a nap, etc.  
  6. Review the word “Claim” on the board.  These are students’ claims about what happened in the scenario; how the independent and dependent variables are related.  A claim is your argument; it is a belief (one sentence) statement that can be argued against other ideas.  It should describe the relationship between the independent and dependent variables.

  7. Review the variables to craft a variety of storylines that connects an independent and dependent variable.  Write these under Claims. A claim could include, “Fisherperson accidentally knocks bucket off of the pier and falls into the marsh trying to get it.”  

  8. Ask students how will we know what the right answer is?  Students will likely say “look at the pictures again for more details”.  Tell students that the word we are looking for is “evidence”.  Evidence is your proof which you take from various sources like research, your field work, articles, interviews, etc. It proves the validity of your reasoning for your claim. This helps to defend your making it even more hard to debate.

    1. Evidence must be:

      Appropriate:  Related to your independent and dependent variables

      Sufficient: The more data you have, the stronger your claim

      Observation-based: Documented by qualitative or quantitative means.Ask students to observe Photo 1 and describe their observations (only what they observe...not infer).  Possible observations could include the main character/s, setting, weather, etc. Students write down one key observation in Evidence on the Fisherman Observation Sheet.

  9. Repeat with other photos.   

  10. Review pieces of evidence from each box.  With each piece of evidence, ask students whether the evidence support this claim, logically?  If so, why? If not, why not?

  11. Review “Reasoning”.  Reasoning is your logical support of your belief or claim; often reasoning answers the question, “Why?”.  Reasoning makes the claim stronger – more difficult to debate. This connects your claim and evidence to show how your data is is important and linked to science ideas.  These sentences usually include “if...then” statements, or uses words like “therefore,” “because,” and “since”. Each piece of evidence must have its own reasoning statement to justify how it supports the claim.

  12. Have students explain how the evidence they selected supports their claim.

  13. Next, show the video file to show how this fisherperson fell.  Identify the students whose claim and reasoning came closest to the real explanation? Explain.

  14. Wrap up this activity by telling students that what they have done earlier is a scientific practice and they will use the same way of thinking about scientific phenomenon.